We do not exit when complexity enters. We stand by our clients through every regulatory shift, audit, and challenge. Unwavering support is the foundation of our firm.
We use cookies to ensure our website functions properly and to understand how you interact with our site. Privacy Policy
The cheap free zone licence sold as a route to 0% tax is not one. Every UAE company, free zone or mainland, is a 9% taxpayer above AED 375,000; the 0% is a Qualifying Free Zone Person relief earned through substance, audit, transfer pricing and the de minimis rule, and lost for five years if one fails.
The search that leads here is usually some version of the same question: what is the cheapest way to start a tax-free company in Dubai. The results are dominated by formation agents quoting a licence for a few thousand dirhams, promising 100% foreign ownership and a 0% tax rate in the same breath, and selling a flexi-desk or a virtual office as the address. The message is that the licence is the tax outcome: buy the cheap free zone package and the 0% follows automatically.
It does not. Since 1 June 2023 the UAE has had a federal corporate tax, and by the 2026 filing season it is fully enforced. Under Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022 every taxable person in the UAE, whether it holds a mainland licence or a free zone licence, is charged 9% on taxable income above AED 375,000 and 0% on the first AED 375,000. The 0% rate that free zones are famous for is not a feature of the licence. It is a separate relief, the Qualifying Free Zone Person regime, that applies only to a defined category of qualifying income and only while a set of continuous conditions is met. The licence gets the company registered. Whether it pays 0% or 9% is decided by what the company does and where it genuinely does it, not by the sticker on the trade licence.
That gap between the licence and the tax position is where the cheap-setup model breaks. A free zone company that assumes it is at 0% because it holds a free zone licence, with no real substance, no audited accounts, and a stream of income that does not qualify, is not a 0% taxpayer that has saved money. It is a 9% taxpayer that has not realised it yet, and the realisation arrives with the first corporate tax return and, in the worst case, with a disqualification that runs for five years. The AED 5,999 licence did not buy a tax rate. It bought an obligation to prove a tax position that the flexi-desk it came with cannot support.
This article sets out the real choice: what a mainland company actually is under corporate tax, what the free zone 0% actually requires, why the de minimis rule turns a single stray transaction into a five-year problem, and why the virtual office at the centre of the cheap package is the thing most likely to fail. The deeper mechanics of qualifying income, the audit, and the property case each have their own analysis in the corridor; this piece is about the decision every founder now makes at formation, and gets wrong when they treat the licence as the answer.
The first thing to fix is the idea that a mainland company and a free zone company sit in different tax worlds. Under corporate tax they start in the same place.
A mainland company, licensed by the Department of Economy and Tourism of the relevant emirate, is a taxable person under Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022. It pays 0% on taxable income up to AED 375,000 and 9% above that. It keeps standard accounting records, files a corporate tax return within nine months of the end of its tax period, and prices any related-party dealings at arm's length. There is no free zone relief to claim and, just as importantly, none to lose. A profitable mainland company pays 9% on the profit above the threshold, and that is the whole of the analysis. It is the plain, predictable position, and for many founders it is the cheaper one once the cost of maintaining a free zone 0% is counted.
A free zone company is also a taxable person under the same law, and it too pays 9% by default. What it can additionally access, if it qualifies, is the Qualifying Free Zone Person regime: 0% on its qualifying income and 9% on the rest. The word that carries the weight is "if". The 0% is not switched on by the free zone licence; it is available only where the company meets every condition in Article 18 of the law, tested every year. A free zone company that fails to qualify is not penalised beyond the ordinary rate on its taxable income for that period, but a company that qualified and then breaches is treated far more harshly, as set out below.
So the honest comparison is not "mainland 9% versus free zone 0%". It is "mainland 9%, simply, versus free zone 0% on qualifying income only, conditionally, with a five-year cliff if the conditions fail, plus the cost of the substance and the audit the conditions require". Put that way, the free zone is not automatically the cheaper or safer choice. It is the choice that pays off only where the business genuinely has qualifying income and genuine substance in the zone, and it is actively worse than mainland for a business that has neither and simply hoped the licence would deliver the rate.
To be a Qualifying Free Zone Person, and to keep the 0% on qualifying income, a free zone company has to satisfy all of the conditions in Article 18, and they are cumulative. Missing one is missing the regime.
Adequate substance in the free zone. The company must maintain adequate substance in the free zone, meaning it undertakes its core income-generating activities there and keeps adequate assets, an adequate number of qualified employees, and an adequate level of operating expenditure in the zone. Activity can be outsourced to a related party or a third party in the free zone, but only under adequate supervision. This is the condition the cheap package cannot meet, and it is dealt with in its own section below.
Qualifying income. Only qualifying income gets the 0% rate. What counts as qualifying income is a closed list under Cabinet Decision No. 100 of 2023, as reformulated by Ministerial Decision No. 229 of 2025, and it turns broadly on transactions with other free zone persons and on defined categories of activity, while excluding, among other things, income from mainland customers that is not covered by a specific carve-out, income from immovable property other than commercial property in the zone, and income from a domestic or foreign permanent establishment. The detailed map of what qualifies is set out in the analysis of how a free zone company earns and loses the 0% rate; the point here is that a great deal of ordinary trading income, in particular sales to mainland UAE customers, is not qualifying income and is taxed at 9%.
Audited financial statements. A Qualifying Free Zone Person must prepare and maintain audited financial statements. This is not optional and not a formality; the audit is a standing annual cost that the cheap licence price never included, and a company that cannot produce audited accounts cannot hold the status.
Transfer-pricing compliance and no election out. The company must comply with the arm's-length principle and the transfer-pricing documentation requirements, and it must not have elected to be taxed at the standard rates. These sit alongside the substance and income tests as continuing obligations.
The de minimis rule. Finally, the company's non-qualifying revenue must stay within the de minimis limit, which is the subject of the next section because it is the condition most often breached by accident.
Each of these is a condition precedent to the 0%, and all of them are tested for every tax period. A company does not qualify once and stay qualified; it re-earns the status every year, and the year it fails a condition is the year the 0% goes.
The de minimis rule is where a small operational choice becomes a large tax event, and it is the single most important thing a founder choosing a free zone needs to understand before they sign for the licence.
The rule allows a Qualifying Free Zone Person a limited amount of non-qualifying revenue before it loses the regime. The ceiling is the lower of AED 5 million or 5% of the company's total revenue. Non-qualifying revenue above that ceiling does not simply get taxed at 9% while the rest stays at 0%. It breaks the regime. Breaching the de minimis limit, like failing any other qualifying condition, disqualifies the company from Qualifying Free Zone Person status for the tax period in which the breach occurs and for the following four tax periods. That is five years during which all of the company's taxable income, not only the offending slice, is charged at 9%.
The reason this catches people is that the breach is easy to trigger and hard to see coming. Consider a free zone company that believes it is comfortably at 0%. It takes on one contract with a mainland UAE customer, or earns a block of income that turns out not to be qualifying, and that non-qualifying revenue tips over 5% of its total revenue for the year. In that moment the company has not lost the 0% on that one contract; it has lost the 0% on everything, for that year and the next four. A single transaction, entered into without checking whether it was qualifying, converts a 0% company into a 9% company for half a decade. The cheap licence made the entry easy and told the founder nothing about the exit.
The contrast with the mainland company is stark. The mainland company never had the 0% on qualifying income to lose, so it has no de minimis limit to breach and no five-year cliff to fall off. It pays 9% on its profit above AED 375,000, takes the mainland contract without a second thought, and files. The free zone company that took the same contract may have destroyed its rate for five years. For a business whose customers are substantially in mainland UAE, the free zone is not the low-tax choice; it is a trap dressed as one, and the mainland licence is both simpler and safer.
At the centre of almost every cheap free zone package is a flexi-desk or a virtual office, and it is the part of the package most likely to fail the one condition the founder was relying on.
The adequate-substance condition requires the free zone to be where the company's core income-generating activities actually happen, supported by adequate people, premises, and operating expenditure in the zone. A flexi-desk, a shared hot-desk used by many companies, or a purely virtual office with no genuine presence, is sold as an address that satisfies the licensing authority. It does not follow that it satisfies the Federal Tax Authority's substance requirement for the 0% rate. A company whose people, decisions, and activity are somewhere else, with only a nominal desk in the zone, is a company whose substance is not in the free zone, and a company whose substance is not in the free zone is not a Qualifying Free Zone Person, whatever its licence says.
This is the cost the cheap package hides. The headline is the licence fee. The reality of a defensible 0% position is genuine premises appropriate to the activity, real employees in the zone, real operating expenditure, and the audited accounts and transfer-pricing records to evidence all of it. Those are recurring costs, and they are frequently larger than the tax the founder was trying to avoid. An owner who bought the licence to get to 0% and stopped there has bought the licence and not the rate, and the difference surfaces when the position is tested.
There is a narrower point for very small companies. Small Business Relief, under Ministerial Decision No. 73 of 2023, lets a resident person with revenue of AED 3 million or less elect to be treated as having no taxable income, so it pays no corporate tax. But the relief is available only for tax periods ending on or before 31 December 2026, and it is not available to a Qualifying Free Zone Person. It is a genuine shelter for a small mainland business in the short term, and it runs out; it is not a substitute for the free zone 0%, and it cannot be combined with it. A small founder is often better served by a mainland company using Small Business Relief while it lasts than by a free zone licence whose 0% the business cannot actually support.
Five assumptions turn a cheap licence into an expensive tax position. Each is a version of believing the licence decided the tax.
Trap one: the licence equals 0%. The founder buys a free zone licence and treats the 0% as automatic. The 0% is the Qualifying Free Zone Person relief on qualifying income, conditional on substance, audit, transfer pricing and de minimis, and tested every year. The answer is to decide the tax position first, on the conditions, and choose the licence to fit it.
Trap two: the flexi-desk is enough. The package includes a virtual office or hot-desk, and the founder assumes it satisfies the substance test. It satisfies the licensing authority, not necessarily the substance condition for the 0% rate. The answer is to put genuine substance, people, premises and expenditure, in the zone, or to accept that the company is a 9% taxpayer.
Trap three: one mainland contract is harmless. The founder takes a mainland-facing contract without checking whether the income qualifies. Non-qualifying revenue above the lower of AED 5 million or 5% of total revenue breaches the de minimis rule. The answer is to test every material revenue stream against the qualifying-income list before booking it, because the cost of a breach is not the tax on that contract.
Trap four: a breach is a one-year problem. The founder assumes that losing the 0% for a bad year is recoverable the next year. A breach disqualifies the company for the current tax period and the following four, taxing everything at 9% for five years. The answer is to treat the de minimis limit as a hard operating constraint, not an annual reconciliation.
Trap five: Small Business Relief is a permanent free zone alternative. A small founder relies on Small Business Relief as a lasting 0%. It is capped at AED 3 million of revenue, available only for tax periods ending on or before 31 December 2026, and not available to a Qualifying Free Zone Person. The answer is to plan for the position after 2026 now, rather than discovering the 9% on the first post-relief return.
The common thread is that the corporate tax outcome is a function of substance and income, not of the licence. The founder who chooses the structure to fit a real business pays the rate the business earns. The founder who buys the cheapest licence and hopes for 0% has bought a position they cannot defend.
The free zone versus mainland choice is the first decision in a longer compliance sequence, and it connects to the rest of the corridor at the points where the position is actually tested.
The qualifying-income map governs the 0%. Whether a given revenue stream is qualifying, and how the de minimis limit is calculated, is set out in full in the analysis of the Qualifying Free Zone Person and how the 0% rate is earned and lost. The free zone choice only pays off where the income genuinely qualifies.
Property does not qualify. A common reason a free zone company breaches is holding UAE real estate, because income from immovable property is generally not qualifying income, as set out in the analysis of the UAE property SPV and the 9% charge.
The position is fixed at the close, not the filing. The substance, the audited accounts, and the qualifying-income analysis have to be in place as the year runs and confirmed when the books are closed, not assembled at the nine-month filing deadline.
For a UK-connected owner, there is a second system. Where the owner is connected to the United Kingdom, a low-taxed UAE company is also within the controlled foreign company and transfer-of-assets-abroad rules, so the UAE rate is only half the picture.
The theme is consistent across the corridor. The licence is the cheap, visible decision at the start. The tax position is the expensive, tested reality that follows, and it is decided by substance and income, not by the price of the licence.
No. A free zone company is a taxable person under Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022 and pays 9% above AED 375,000 by default. The 0% rate applies only to the qualifying income of a Qualifying Free Zone Person, and only while the company meets all the conditions in Article 18, including adequate substance, audited accounts, transfer-pricing compliance and the de minimis rule. The licence does not confer the rate; the conditions do.
A mainland company pays 0% up to AED 375,000 and 9% above, with standard accounting and no free zone conditions to meet or lose. A free zone company can access 0% on its qualifying income as a Qualifying Free Zone Person, but only if it satisfies the Article 18 conditions every year, and it faces a five-year disqualification if it breaches them. Mainland is simpler and carries no cliff; the free zone pays off only with genuine qualifying income and substance in the zone.
The de minimis rule caps a Qualifying Free Zone Person's non-qualifying revenue at the lower of AED 5 million or 5% of total revenue. If non-qualifying revenue exceeds that limit, the company loses Qualifying Free Zone Person status for that tax period and the following four, so all of its income is taxed at 9% for five years. A single contract with a mainland customer that is not qualifying income can breach the limit, which is why it matters before the transaction, not after.
Usually not for the 0% rate. The adequate-substance condition requires the company's core income-generating activities, people, premises and operating expenditure to be genuinely in the free zone. A flexi-desk or virtual office may satisfy the licensing authority, but a company with no real presence in the zone does not meet the substance condition for Qualifying Free Zone Person status, and the licence does not cure that.
Rarely, once the full cost is counted. The 0% rate a free zone licence points to requires genuine substance in the zone, audited financial statements, and transfer-pricing records, which are recurring costs the licence price omits. For many small businesses a mainland company, or a free zone company assessed honestly against the conditions, is cheaper in total than a low-cost licence whose 0% the business cannot support.
Only in the short term and only if you qualify. Small Business Relief under Ministerial Decision No. 73 of 2023 lets a resident person with revenue of AED 3 million or less elect to be treated as having no taxable income, but it is available only for tax periods ending on or before 31 December 2026, and it is not available to a Qualifying Free Zone Person. It can suit a small mainland business now, but it runs out, and it is not a substitute for the free zone regime.
It loses Qualifying Free Zone Person status for the tax period of the breach and for the following four tax periods, so its income is taxed at 9% for five years rather than 0% on qualifying income. The disqualification applies to all of the company's taxable income, not only the part that caused the breach. This is the central risk that a mainland company does not carry.
A corporate tax return is due within nine months of the end of the tax period. A company with a 31 December 2025 year-end files, and pays, by 30 September 2026. That return is where the free zone position is either supported by the substance, the audited accounts and the qualifying-income analysis, or exposed, and where a de minimis breach first becomes visible.
The licence is the cheapest and most visible part of setting up in the UAE, and it is the part that decides the least. The tax position is decided by where the business genuinely operates and what it genuinely earns, tested every year and lost for five if it fails. A cheap licence over a flexi-desk does not deliver a 0% rate. It delivers the obligation to prove one, and the bill when the proof is not there.
Critical advisory. The jurisdictional frameworks set out above carry strict liability and retroactive tax exposure. Executing these structures through standard formation agents, without institutional-grade tax architecture, is a primary trigger for HMRC and Federal Tax Authority audits. To mitigate systemic risk and discuss bespoke structuring, initiate a confidential briefing with our Managing Partners.
The dual contract, a UK contract for UK duties and an offshore one for UAE duties, never made a UK resident’s UAE salary tax-free. It worked only under the remittance basis, abolished on 6 April 2025. A UK resident is now taxed on worldwide employment income as it arises, whether paid under one contract or two.
Read AnalysisGulf capital holding UK residential property through a fleet of offshore or UAE special purpose vehicles built the envelope as a shield. Since 6 April 2020 those companies are UK corporation taxpayers, and the associated companies rule divides one set of rate limits across the whole fleet.
Read Analysis